On 8/4/05, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But in my
> reply to Sascha I pointed out to him that his way of applying the term
> "a program" to Linux would fit GNU/Linux quite as well. Which did not
> really serve to render the view he claimed to support more plausible.
Oh, I think yes, it does make it more plausible. I call Emacs "a
program", irrespective of whether it includes other, subservient
programs (like movemail, emacsclient, etc.). I don't think the
definition of "program" is as monolithic as you make it sound.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
