Jason Rumney wrote: > "Stuart D. Herring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>Moreover, this whole change would be optional (customizable), so the >>user of any such macro could turn off that option > > OK. I don't expect my hypothetical case will come up often, but it is > possible. I just wanted to make sure that simply binding some > variables to nil was not the final solution to this.
What is wrong with that solution? -- Kevin Rodgers _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
