On 10/9/07, Richard G Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm interested in this. Why would an Org file with permissions like 700 > be any more virus friendly than an .emacs with the same permissions? Een > taking the windows case, a .emacs is executed each and every time, but > the org file only when loaded and acted upon.
Perhaps it an over reaction on my part. I know the occasional org-file gets posted on this list. I'd like to see org catch on and see more info made available in org files. I don't normally send my .emacs file(s) to folks. That's my custom setup. (Though once in a while someone does copy it.) If org becomes popular enough that people pass data around in it, then it could be more of an issue. Especially since I think the triggers would be in drawers which are all always hidden unless you go and explicitly open each one. So you have hidden code in a powerful language. It's not very hidden and I know it not likely that org's format would catch on the way I'd like. Anyhow, I'm not saying don't do it. I just wanted to be sure it wasn't overlooked. Edd _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode