Hi Nicolas On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I don't understand because the org-time-stamp-formats you mention is > > already used and does not cover inactive timestamps. > > I'm talking about the function, not the variable.
Now I found it: The name of the function you mention is not `org-time-stamp-formats' but `org-time-stamp-format' without the "s" at the end. I pushed my change, thank you for your help. Michael
