Hello, Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> writes:
> I worked on a project to port the Org manual to Org about three years > ago. At the time, I thought the Texinfo exporter supported the project > quite well. > > The project had a mixed reception and ultimately wasn't adopted, but I > don't remember Texinfo exporter deficiencies figuring into the > decision. AFAIR, the problem is that Emacs developers fix spelling issues right into the ".texi" document, so we would need to backport each of their changes into the Org source. Duplicated efforts. However, I still think it would be nice to have the document somewhere in the Org tree, perhaps in contrib/ as a start, then possibly one day in doc/. As a side note, another interesting project would be an "info" export back-end. Currently, producing an info file is very slow because we go through the "texinfo" format first. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
