Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: > Thomas S. Dye <t...@tsdye.com> writes: > >> I worked on a project to port the Org manual to Org about three years >> ago. At the time, I thought the Texinfo exporter supported the project >> quite well. >> >> The project had a mixed reception and ultimately wasn't adopted, but I >> don't remember Texinfo exporter deficiencies figuring into the >> decision. > > AFAIR, the problem is that Emacs developers fix spelling issues right > into the ".texi" document, so we would need to backport each of their > changes into the Org source. Duplicated efforts.
It is duplicated effort, but it's not too much beyond a normal backport. If this is the only issue with moving to Org for the manual, I'd be happy to take care of it when I backport changes. -- Kyle
