Yasushi SHOJI <ya...@atmark-techno.com> writes: > Alan Tyree wrote: >> >> Is this the way it should be? The first DEADLINE: shows up both as a >> warning and on the due date in the agenda, but the second one does >> not. It only works for me if the DEADLINE: is the first line after the >> heading. Version 9, emacs 24 >> >> *** test 1 >> DEADLINE: <2016-11-19 Sat> >> >> *** test 2 >> >> DEADLINE: <2016-11-19 Sat> > > at release_9.0.1-47-gb062593 with the following org file, org-agenda > shows the closed entry. Is this also related? > > Yes, org-lint complains about the 4th "scheduled" line saying: > "Misplaced planning info line", but isn't deadline planning info line? > is any of planning info line not allowed in the body? > > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ---- > * DONE org > DEADLINE: [2016-01-07 Thu 17:39] > > SCHEDULED: <2015-09-29 Tue .+1w> > > ---- >8 ---- cut ---- >8 ----
A shoot in the dark: replace the [] by <>. [] for DEADLINE does not make much sense... -- Sebastien Vauban
