>> "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based >> background process solutions) is unlikely to go away. > While I haven't had time to work on CEDET lately, I'd be happy to discuss > specific performance issues and share ideas on how to improve them, > presumably after the most recent merge is completed.
Isn't it the case that CEDET could also make use of a Clang backend?
Stefan
