Hello,
Greg Minshall <minsh...@acm.org> writes:
> not wanting to look gift horses, etc., but i've a question. if i
> understand the change correctly
> ----
> - (looking-at "\\<call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]"))
> + (looking-at "call_\\([^ \t\n[(]+\\)[([]"))
> ----
> now something like "oncall_foo()" will be taken as "on" followed by the
> inline results of call_foo(). is that right? (testing, seems to be.)
Correct.
> i worry that might be a bit too lenient.
Note there is no such restriction on macros either, so you can write
on{{{call}}}
If "call" macro expands to "call_foo()", you get a surprising error if
the inline call is not expanded thereafter.
> sometimes one might want "oncall_foo()" to stay as "oncall_foo()".
In this case, you can use verbatim markup, or even non-breaking space
before the underscore.
Whatever the regexp we use, some contexts will require non-breaking
space anyway. The current solution is at least consistent with other
parts of Org (e.g., macros).
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
