Greg Minshall <minsh...@acm.org> writes: > thanks for the reply. i'd suggest reverting (most of) 7efa... so that > foocall_foo() *stays* as foocall_foo(). (i.e., put the "\\<" back in > front of "call_" and "sys_".) otherwise, we have no (straight forward) > way (am i right? sometimes my head hurts!) to get a plain > "foocall_foo()" in the output.
Of course we do: just write foocall<ZSWP>_foo() or foocall_foo<ZSWP>() etc.
