Hello, cesar mena <cesar.m...@gmail.com> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> However, we still need to move forward. So, I suggest to revert the >> change about inactive timestamps. Inactive timestamps cannot be >> repeated. This is less disruptive than the current situation. > > yes, agreed. Done in maint. >> However, I also suggest to add a new hook, run after repeating >> timestamps. With this hook, and a proper, user-specific, markup, it >> should be possible to pick inactive timestamps in the section and >> "repeat" them manually, i.e., on a case-by-case basis. Done too. > another (maybe crazy) idea is to advise org-auto-repeat-maybe and set > org-repeat-re as needed before it gets called. It is possible, but should be done on the user side, not on the Org one. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
