hello, Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> writes:
> Hello, > > cesar mena <[email protected]> writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> writes: >>> However, we still need to move forward. So, I suggest to revert the >>> change about inactive timestamps. Inactive timestamps cannot be >>> repeated. This is less disruptive than the current situation. >> >> yes, agreed. > > Done in maint. looks good here. thanks nicolas. best, -cesar
