On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 3:28 AM Jens Lechtenboerger <lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de wrote:
> > - org-reveal [3]: R > - org-re-reveal [4]: r (conflict with RSS) > I see that org-re-reveal is based off org-reveal. So do you see a use case where people would `require' both org-reveal and org-re-reveal? If not, then using the same binding as that of org-reveal should be fine too. Where could we document the resulting list? > I'm pretty sure there are many more Org backends out there. For example, I have a little ox-minutes backend that uses the M binding (and overrides the binding for ox-man, but that's fine for me as I don't use ox-man). We can start collecting a list of all Org backends on the Worg wiki. That's a good idea. But doing so in order to not override the binding of some other backend might not be possible. I’m thinking of changing org-re-reveal to p (for presentation) or v > (as occurring letter). What about R as I suggested above? Or C-r? So far, no back-end uses the > control key. Any reasons not to do this? > You could probably use C-<letter>, but one has to ensure that it doesn't override the inbuilt bindings like C-s (C-c C-e C-s ..). Also, not sure if that override would actually be effective. >
