Gustav Wikström <> writes:

> Ah, you mean the reference on line 3216. No, I don't think it can be
> removed. And I honestly don't think it should be either. It's there to
> let attachment links mirror the peculiarities of file links. It's
> needed for feature compatibility. I don't see the issue with that.
> It's a core link type and it needs the information. That particular
> logic doesn't affect the parse tree. It's there only to give
> attachment links the same properties as file links.

I disagree. This is not a core link type. The issue is that the parser
should self-contained. Please use a different way to obtain the
information; we already discussed it and suggested multiple solutions.

Reply via email to