Kyle Meyer <k...@kyleam.com> writes: > I also don't find the current behavior particularly intuitive. (I'm > also not really a babel user, so my opinion probably shouldn't count for > much.) If we were adding it today, I think what you describe would be > better, but, as you mention, breakage also now also weighs against > making a change here. > > In any case, I'd suggest raising the discussion on the list after the > 9.4 release.
Ok, I'll follow up on this then. >>> Right, to reflect the current behavior established as a result of the >>> above thread, I think that should be reworded to distinguish between an >>> absent :file-desc header and one with no argument. Sorry for not >>> catching that when reviewing your initial patch. >> >> No worries, and I agree the documentation should be updated. I'm happy >> to provide the patch myself, but I'd like to talk through whether the >> current implementation is the correct one before I do. > > Thanks. To avoid any confusion coming from this description making it > into the 9.4 release, I've updated it in 4b2123fb7. Thanks for fixing that Kyle. Matt
