Matt Huszagh writes:
> This patch looks good. I've tested it and it works well for me. Thanks
> for coming up with a good solution!
Thanks for testing it out.
> I think the one thing still missing is some documentation in the info
> manual. Something along the lines of [...]
Yep, the manual should definitely be updated in a final patch. What you
suggest looks good to me.
> Feel free to add this (or something else) to your patch. Or, if you'd
> prefer that I created a patch for it, let me know.
I'd be happy for you to take what I sent and work it into a proper
patch. Here are some other loose ends in addition to the manual update
you mentioned:
* a NEWS entry for 9.5
* decide whether (:file-desc . []) should be handled explicitly rather
than the current "any value that org-babel-read doesn't map to nil
or a string"
* check that there's a test case for each :file-desc scenario
Thanks.
