Am 19.05.2021 um 17:23 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
\cite could be [cite/bare: ...]This would be confusing. So far, "bare" is a style variant. Your suggestion promotes it exceptionally to a full-fledged style. It hurts my logic. :)
Could "\cite" be [cite/parens/bare:...] instead?
Another thought here: Yes, it could be [cite/parens/bare:...] but also [cite/note/bare:...].@Bruce: We don't have bare citation in CSL currently, right? Perhaps we should add this to add some portability...
Denis
