On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:43 PM Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Bruce D'Arcus" <[email protected]> writes: > > > In an earlier discussion, people raised the issue of fontification and > > previews. > > > > But I'm wondering what Nicolas has already implemented, and what he or > > others might still add. > > > > Details: > > > > John Kitchin (based on his experience with org-ref): > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2021-04/msg00438.html > > > > He suggested a green face for known references, and red for unknown. > > > > I think Nicolas implemented this basic idea somewhere, but I am not > > noticing it; I don't see any difference with incorrect keys. > > You need to use "basic" processor for activation. It only supports > ".bib" files.
Beyond requiring oc-basic (or any other "activate" processor), do I need to do anything more to "use" it? ... > > I think that example would imply overlays as well, though I don't > > really understand all the technical details or org-specific pros and > > cons (tooltips vs overlays and such), but am just wondering: > > > > 1. what is already included, and what should ship default? Perhaps > > Andras' idea would fit for oc-csl, since it already depends on > > citeproc-el? > > "oc-csl" could also handle the "activate" capacity. So could Org Ref. > > > 2. if some is not included, say preview, how would one add that? I > > assume the API supports it; so one would just install, say, a little > > package and add that as a "follow" processor? And one could add > > multiple such processors? > > You can only have one "activate" processor at a time. However, that > processor may itself be extensible. So then it might be ideal to have oc-csl be such an extensible "activate" processor then? >From what John has said here, it's likely to be quite awhile before we see an org-ref rewritten for org-cite. Bruce
