"Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > Beyond requiring oc-basic (or any other "activate" processor), do I > need to do anything more to "use" it?
You need to associate it to the "active" capability: (setq org-cite-activate-processor 'basic) (or with a file-local variable). > So then it might be ideal to have oc-csl be such an extensible > "activate" processor then? It could be a good basis. > From what John has said here, it's likely to be quite awhile before we > see an org-ref rewritten for org-cite. Maybe it provides interface we could write a thin wrapper with, and plug it into the activate function.
