Sorry for the delay, I got side-tracked with many other things. Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>> It is possible to mix the two styles; >> >> Well... it turned out not to be true, but I should be able to get it >> to work. > > Then I suggest to use "attr_texinfo" keyword, for example: > > #+attr_texinfo: :shorthand t > - item... > > This way, we ensure the change is local. `org-texinfo-item' already > checks :sep attribute. I am sure I can get it to work just fine without a need for that. It just turns out that I haven't done so yet, because I only used the ox-texinfo+ style in manuals that use that style exclusively. Now that you have signaled that there is a good change that this would be included in Org, putting in the work to use both styles in parallel is actually justified. But it likely will be a few weeks until I get to work because I looked at the current implementation again and decided that it would be better to start over and do the work using org-element instead of at the latest possible moment when strings are being concatenated as ox-texinfo+ currently does. > I see no reason to change the prefix, since these functions are part of > ox-texinfo. I didn't look closely at your code, tho, so I may be wide of > the mark. I haven't started working on the org-element based implementation yet, but I expect that won't actually need any new function definitions so, the question is moot anyway. (But just in case: I agree.) Cheers, Jonas