Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> writes: >>>>>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Marco Wahl wrote: > >> Possibly a split of function org-make-manuals in org-make-manual and >> org-make-guide and further create two single targets instead of the >> current double target is more clear. > >> See the patch. > >> WDYT? > > Sure, that's much cleaner. (I didn't dare to change the elisp code > because it is also more intrusive.) > >> -org.texi orgguide.texi: org-manual.org org-guide.org >> +org.texi: org-manual.org org-guide.org > > Shouldn't it have only org-manual.org as prerequisite? > >> $(BATCH) \ >> --eval '(add-to-list `load-path "../lisp")' \ >> --eval '(load "../mk/org-fixup.el")' \ >> - --eval '(org-make-manuals)' >> + --eval '(org-make-manual)' >> + >> +orgguide.texi: org-manual.org org-guide.org > > Similar here, only org-guide.org? > >> + $(BATCH) \ >> + --eval '(add-to-list `load-path "../lisp")' \ >> + --eval '(load "../mk/org-fixup.el")' \ >> + --eval '(org-make-guide)'
Yes, thanks. The issue should be fixed with a slightly more defensive change than stated in the last patch (by keeping function org-make-manuals.) Thanks again, -- Marco