Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:27 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > wrote: >> I can add it, but "full" is already the name of a variant, so >> [cite/full: ...] and [cite/style/full: ...] would mean different things. >> Is this a problem, or do you think of a better style name? > > FWIW, Nicolas, biblatex "fullcite" is equivalent to natbib/bibtex "bibentry". > > That might be a reasonable alternative style name? > >> Also, are there possible variants for this style? > > AFAIK, no. Hmm, OK. What about: (“fullcite” nil “fullcite” nil nil) ? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
