On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 6:04 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > > Hello, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" <bdar...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 5:27 PM Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > > wrote: > > >> I can add it, but "full" is already the name of a variant, so > >> [cite/full: ...] and [cite/style/full: ...] would mean different things. > >> Is this a problem, or do you think of a better style name? > > > > FWIW, Nicolas, biblatex "fullcite" is equivalent to natbib/bibtex > > "bibentry". > > > > That might be a reasonable alternative style name? > > > >> Also, are there possible variants for this style? > > > > AFAIK, no. > > Hmm, OK. What about: > > (“fullcite” nil “fullcite” nil nil) > > ?
Seems fine by me, so long as you use the same name for natbib if and when you add bibentry support? Bruce
