On 04/11/2022 11:23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
Ihor Radchenko writes:
These arguments mean that auto-cleaning \\[0pt] is not always safe and
may be a subject of surrounding LaTeX context.
I still believe that
something\\[0pt]%__ORG_EXPORT__
is quite safe to remove (depending on the following character) and
unlikely harmful if remained for some reason.
What about the side effect you mentioned in a previous email?
TeX reads
"a% comment
b"
as "ab", dropping newline and starting spaces.
Unlike in Org, in TeX "a\\b" still contains a line break. Besides exotic
packages and user setups it should just work. After all, during normal
operation all "%__ORG_EXPORT__" should be stripped by a filter. They are
just marks where a decision is necessary whether to retain "[0pt]" or to
remove it.
On 03/11/2022 22:48, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Max Nikulin writes:
I have not managed to convince even the tabularray developer. And I
have not tried to find a way to reach more LaTeX developers.
I think that people from the LaTeX team and the authors of the most
popular packages are often very active on tex.stackexchange.com
Stackexchange is for questions, not for discussions and bugs. At certain
point I was going to ask a question there, I even prepared a draft.
After that I decided to try a command expanding to nothing and found
\empty. I was not aware that tabularray uses a different approach to
parsing.
And the repo on GitHub for the LaTeX project: https://github.com/latex3
https://github.com/latex3/latex3/issues may be an appropriate place,
thank you.
