Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes:
[...]
>> +individual commands for more information.
>> +
>> +This function runs the hook `org-shiftmetaleft-hook' as a first
>> +step, `org-shiftmetaleft-final-hook' as the penultimate step, and
>> +returns at first non-nil value."
>
> Upon looking closer, I realized that you also defined return value of
> the function here. Is there any particular reason for this? The return
> value is currently not defined and supposed to be discarded.
Maybe I got it wrong, but I tried to follow the docstring for
`org-metaleft'. And I don't see here the use of the return value either:
#+begin_example
(defun org-metaleft (&optional _arg)
"...
This function runs the hook `org-metaleft-hook' as a first step,
and returns at first non-nil value."
...)
#+end_example
Should I keep it like this?
This function runs the hook `org-shiftmetaleft-hook' as a first
step, and `org-shiftmetaleft-final-hook' as the penultimate step.
