[i.e. agree that the manuals and standard toc at top imo do a good job for accessibility.]
On 8/4/23, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > fwiw i agree with the non-fancy toc concept for accessibility. > > On 8/4/23, Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 05/08/2023 05:57, Rudolf Adamkovič wrote: >>> P.S. #2: The Table of Contents (TOC) on the >>> WORG is "jumpy" on Safari. In fact, it has >>> always been problematic for me, in one way or >>> another. Why cannot TOC be included at the >>> beginning of the document, like in standard >>> Org exports? Org and Emacs manuals, with no >>> "smart" side bars, get it right, IMO. >> >> I have found your message in a dedicated thread >> >> Rudolf Adamkovič to emacs-orgmode… Re: [accessibility] worg obscures >> text. Sun, 12 Jun 2022 21:35:14 +0200. >> https://list.org.mode.org/m2v8t5y8st....@me.com >> >> Somebody should propose a CSS for responsive design for Worg. Perhaps >> with ability to open/close table of contents on mobile devices. >> >> > > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic > > A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: > https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > -- The Kafka Pandemic A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
