> From: Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> > Date: Thu, 2023-09-07 13:19 +0300 > >> From: Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> >> Cc: i...@whxvd.name, 65...@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:00:49 +0000 >> >> Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: >> >> > Then perhaps just a special value for buffer-invisibility-spec, or >> > some other simple variation of a property Org already uses? >> >> We may have a misunderstanding here. >> In "* Heading text :tag1:tag2:", everything is visible yet Org needs to >> protect ":tag1:tag2: from being killed by `kill-line', but not from >> `kill-whole-line'. Moreover, the behaviour also depends on the point >> position - if point is inside ":tag1:tag2:", we fall back to the default >> behaviour. And the whole "special" behaviour can also be switched off by >> flipping `org-special-ctrl-k'. >> >> Invisibility has nothing to do with this need. > > Isn't it true that invisibility is what causes the user expectations > in this case to begin with? Then saying that "invisibility has > nothing to do with this" is not really accurate, is it?
I am not 100 % sure what exactly the misunderstanding is. My first guess would be: You assume that the tags are invisible, too. But that is not the case. Because of that the special handling of tags by `org-kill-line' has nothing to do with visibility.
