Thanks for the quick answer! Okay, if there is no principled reason why it shouldn't be customizable, I can try to get around to write a patch. I assume there's a lot of other hardcoded cases flying around though, so it might be a while.
> That one is most likely still under moderation. Our moderation is > manual, done by volunteers. I see, sorry for the spam. May the moderators just delete/ignore that one then. On Wed, 2023-11-15 at 10:53 +0000, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > Henrik Hörmann <leinf...@mailbox.org> writes: > > > It seems that inconsistencies with regard to lowercase/uppercase > > conventions still abound. Is there a reason that `org-insert- > > property- > > drawer' has a hardcoded `(insert ":PROPERTIES:\n:END:")'? I'd > > really > > like to customize this. > > Org keywords are case-insensitive. The choice of upper/lower case > when > automatically inserting various Org elements is mostly historical. > Several commands determine the case from context though (not possible > in > this particular case). > > If you wish the case to be fully customizeable, feel free to submit a > patch. But that patch would need to work across Org, not just for > property drawers. > > > (Sorry for the repeated mail, I sent the first one before I joined > > the > > mailing list.) > > That one is most likely still under moderation. Our moderation is > manual, done by volunteers. >
