>>>>> Juan Manuel Macías <maciasch...@posteo.net> writes:
> Max Nikulin writes:
>> I recall some tricks with \footnotemark and \footnotetext, but I
>> do not remember details and whether it may work for section
>> titles. Complications may arise if a heading title has several
>> footnotes.
> ox-latex has 'org-latex--delayed-footnotes-definitions': "[...]
> This function is used within constructs that don't support
> \footnote{} command (e.g., an item tag). In that case,
> \footnotemark is used within the construct and the function just
> outside of it."
> The \footnotetext/\footnotemark option works well for specific
> cases, but in general I don't like to abuse this method.
>> Perhaps it is better to avoid footnotes in titles and to add some
>> phrase to the body instead.
> That is the ideal scenario. I also believe that footnotes should
> be avoided in section headings, if possible. Or at least, have
> another type of numbering (symbols, letters...). The manyfoot and
> bigfoot packages allow constructions of this type, with various
> footnote apparatus.
Indeed, but many journals *require* footnotes in titles, especially for
affiliation, email, etc.
