Hi Ihor, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes:
> However, I am still puzzled how different licenses may apply to the > exact same text. In particular, it is not clear how the contradictions > between licenses are handled in such scenario. (Or are you saying that > CC BY SA 4.0 is fully compatible with GNU DFL 1.3?) If a text is published under two different licenses, the user can choose between them: if he chooses CC BY SA 4.0, he must abide by CC BY SA 4.0; if he chooses GNU FDL 1.3+, he must abide by GNU FDL 1.3+. He does not choose both *at the same time*. If he clones a dual-licensed repo and doesn't change the license notice, he gives other users the same choice. Is it a little clearer? -- Bastien
