Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes: > If a text is published under two different licenses, the user can choose > between them: if he chooses CC BY SA 4.0, he must abide by CC BY SA 4.0; > if he chooses GNU FDL 1.3+, he must abide by GNU FDL 1.3+. He does not > choose both *at the same time*. > > If he clones a dual-licensed repo and doesn't change the license notice, > he gives other users the same choice. > > Is it a little clearer?
Yes, it is. I personally see no downsides in dual-licensing (assuming that at least some users would prefer such a choice). However, if we want to do it we: 1. Must ask the existing WORG contributors whether they are ok with re-licensing 2. May ask RMS whether he has objections. Do you think it is worth it? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
