Derek Chen-Becker <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks, fixed! > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 6:05 AM Rudolf Adamkovič <[email protected]> wrote: > > Derek Chen-Becker <[email protected]> writes: > > > + between A and Z or an integer number between 0 and 64, preceded by > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > just "integer" > (nobody says "integer number")
Sorry for applying the earlier patch without reviewing it carefully enough. I'd like to go ahead again and apply this patch as soon as possible to fix the "integral". But are there further refinements, while we're at it? Is "A single uppercase alphabetic character between A and Z" clear and correct enough now? In English it's fairly conventional to use "alphabetic character" means a letter of the /English/ alphabet. But as Ihor pointed out, there are different alphabets, so it's ambiguous at the least, and on the syntax page we should be careful. However, the worg/org-syntax.org page also refers to "alphabetic characters" under blocks (switches), entities (can be followed by a non-alphabetic character), LaTeX fragments, and macros. I think most or all of these mean [a-zA-Z]. Should we fix these as well? Is "between A and Z" unambiguous? Can we assume everyone understands that we're talking about charsets with an ASCII block? In my local alphabet, "between A and Z" includes Č, Ć, and Š, but there is no charset with this order. And do we all understand that "between...and" includes the endpoints, or should we say "from A to Z"? :-) Regards, Christian
