Derek Chen-Becker <[email protected]> writes: > I was thinking about this a bit and I have two ideas. The first would > be to specify "uppercase ASCII alphabetic character", since ASCII does > not support anything with accents.
In non-English countries, for all practical purposed, ASCII means 8-bit "extended ASCII". For example, in Central Europe, the second part of ASCII would be ISO-8859-2 or CP-1250, containing accented characters. > The other would be to use a precise definition based on elisp of > "characters whose literal form (e.g. A?, B?, etc) evaluates to an > integer between 65 and 90". I would say something like "a capital English alphabet character A through Z (ASCII code 65 through 90)", which is 100% precise. Rudy -- "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." --- Edward Snowden, 2015 Rudolf Adamkovič <[email protected]> [he/him] http://adamkovic.org
