On 2026-01-28 22:10, [email protected] wrote: > In real cases, my items are exercises. Each comment is a summary of > what the exercise is about. The bodies are not titles, but start > like 'Let $f(x)$ be a function ...'. So your solution would not > work for me.
Fair enough! It would look a strange to see that description formatted as a title in the Org buffer, even if it’s not exported that way in your case. On 2026-01-29 13:16, [email protected] wrote: > Christian Moe writes on Thu 29 Jan 2026 15:34: >> As a workaround for now, you could try adding a 'non-breaking >> space' character (represented by an underscore below) *after* the >> space after the star. >> >> * _@@comment: comment for Item 2@@ >> >> The results should be visually indistinguishable from what you're >> after, if I understand correctly. > > It does not work for me. Hmm, it does for me. Maybe try: #+LATEX_COMPILER: lualatex or use @@latex:~@@ instead of the space character? > I like when anything useful is documented. Possibly in some > miscellaneous section, possibly along with all the reasons not to > use it. For sure, I agree it should be documented somewhere. I’m just not sure if the manual should encourage it, unless it’s made official by reserving one of the keywords e.g. @@-:…@@. -- Jacob S. Gordon [email protected] Please don’t send me HTML emails or MS Office/Apple iWork documents. https://useplaintext.email/#etiquette https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument
