Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > "J.D. Smith" <[email protected]> writes: > >> Thanks for the feedback. > > Here is some more feedback from OrgMeetup:
Thanks for discussing. > 1. It would be nice to support pretty entities As I understand them, pretty entities use composition properties, so unlike emphasized text and links, point can /never/ fall inside them — it will always skip from one side to the other. So there is no "point ambiguity". Really then only unhiding pretty entities would make sense, but I don't anticipate making unhiding the default (note: we should discuss the defaults). Open to other thoughts. > 2. There was a question whether there is much point > changing the cursor or revealing hidden markers when the text is > read-only. Might be a user option to consider I don't think it hurts to have it on, but it's easy to add things to a buffer-local `read-only-mode-hook' if they'd like to disable some features.
