Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <[email protected]> writes: > Please feel free to forward. Answers directly to me or through the orgmode > mailing list welcome. > > This is the second part of the survey regarding font control. First an > introduction to put us all in the same page > > * Background: > > When exporting to Emacs, there are two layers: > - language dependencies > - font management > > ** Regarding language management: > Unless configured through the document class or using babel or polyglossia, > the default language for dates, hyphenation, section > headings, etc. is American English. Depending on the underlying or imported > language management package, language names vary. > Additionally, language management includes functions like left-to-right vs. > right-to-left text layout. > > ** Regarding font management: > When dealing with modern (utf8) LaTeX compilers, the underlying font > management package is fontspec. In addition to it, polyglossia > and babel provide a layer around fontspec that allows per-language fonts. > Each of these packages has their own font definition > macros, font family names, etc. > > * The survey proper > Please tick the option that applies to you best in each of the sections. > > Basics: > [x] I understand emacs-lisp and can write my configs from the > documentation provided
I prefer not to, though. Double this when I don't know the backend well either, and I don't know LaTeX well. > [x] I copy and paste (emacs-lisp) configs and could slightly modify them to > adapt them to my needs > [] emacs-lisp, no please > General font config: > [] I want my configurations match the manual(s) of the package(s) I use as > much as possible. > [] I prefer to have an abstraction that can be used independently of the > font/language package I use. > Language codes: > [] I'm comfortable enough with the language codes used by org-mode > [] I'd rather use the language names/codes from my font/language package of > choice. > > Thanks for any input. > /PA > > PS: A third survey will be following shortly for people who have dared to try > out the feature branch.
