Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > A more general question is also whether we need to *parse* links and > other markup inside comments. It would make sense, especially given that > commented headings can contain markup. Although there might be pros and > cons.
I have seen multiple requests concerning how Org markup should be handled inside comments: # Should [[https://www.example.com][link]] be rendered as "link" # Should we *hide* emphasis markers? # Should we make *bold* look bold inside the comment? Just recently I saw a question about fontifying markup inside comments. Yet, in this thread, the request is opposite - revealing the links inside comments. I can see a value of displaying the markup inside comments, and recognizing it on the parser level. Then, the fontification can be customized to not fontify anything (like we do now, ish, except links), to fontify, or fontify but not hide the emphasis markers/link brackets. WDYT? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
