Bastien wrote:
>Hi all,

>what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg?

>Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the
>GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA
>3.0[3] license.  This solution would make it possible to take excerpts
>from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs,
>which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual.

>Would any Worg contributor have objection to this?

No objection.  Would have suggested the same.

  -- David
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6

Attachment: pgpbUsDDxhiIw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.

Reply via email to