David Maus <dm...@ictsoc.de> writes:

> Bastien wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg?
>>Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the
>>GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA
>>3.0[3] license.  This solution would make it possible to take excerpts
>>from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs,
>>which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual.
>>Would any Worg contributor have objection to this?
> No objection.  Would have suggested the same.

No objection here either.


Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.

Reply via email to