David Maus <dm...@ictsoc.de> writes: > Bastien wrote: >>Hi all, > >>what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? > >>Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the >>GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA >>3.0[3] license. This solution would make it possible to take excerpts >>from Worg and put them into Org manual for later inclusion in Emacs, >>which uses GFDL 1.3 for the Emacs manual. > >>Would any Worg contributor have objection to this? > > No objection. Would have suggested the same.
No objection here either. -Bernt _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
