Hi Rainer, hi Bernt,
On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
Hi all!
lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot...
For toplevel clocktables which just sum up "all" I use ":maxlevel 0"
The manual reads
:maxlevel Maximum level depth to which times are listed in the
table.
which I misunderstood.
I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not
added!
But it looks like ":maxlevel 0" does not add everything up.
I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me.
Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here.
How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds
up everything in the scope?
BTW, the ":stepskip0" parameter does not seem to be included in
the manual.
It is in the manual.
- Carsten
Rainer
Carsten,
maybe I misunderstood.
1. Without maxlevbel I get I get
#+BEGIN: clocktable :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp
t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07]
| File | L | Timestamp | Headline |
Time | | |
|-------------------+---+---------------------+----------------
+----------+--------+--------|
| | | Timestamp | *Total time* |
*327:51* | | |
...
with :maxlevel 0 I get
#+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope ("file1.org"
"file2") :timestamp t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend
"<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11]
| File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time |
|------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
| | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* |
|------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
#+END:
I would like to get the same results!
Is ":maxlevel 0" intended to not include the sublevel clocks?
I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify.
Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand.
But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest
version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make sure
clock tables deliver the same results?
Thanks!
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
