Am 26.10.2010 13:30, schrieb Carsten Dominik: > Hi Rainer, hi Bernt, > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: > >> Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik: >>> >>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all! >>>> >>>> lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot... >>>> >>>> For toplevel clocktables which just sum up "all" I use ":maxlevel 0" >>>> >>>> The manual reads >>>> >>>> :maxlevel Maximum level depth to which times are listed in the table. >>>> >>>> which I misunderstood. >>>> I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added! >>>> But it looks like ":maxlevel 0" does not add everything up. >>> >>> >>> I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me. >>> >>>> >>>> Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up >>>> everything in the scope? >>>> >>>> BTW, the ":stepskip0" parameter does not seem to be included in the manual. >>> >>> It is in the manual. >>> >>> - Carsten >>>> >>>> >>>> Rainer >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> Carsten, >> >> maybe I misunderstood. >> >> >> 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get >> >> #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp t :tstart >> "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>" >> Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07] >> >> | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | >> | | >> |-------------------+---+---------------------+----------------+----------+--------+--------| >> | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* | >> | | >> ... >> >> >> >> with :maxlevel 0 I get >> >> >> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp t >> :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>" >> Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11] >> >> | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | >> |------+---+-----------+--------------+----------| >> | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* | >> |------+---+-----------+--------------+----------| >> #+END: >> >> >> I would like to get the same results! >> Is ":maxlevel 0" intended to not include the sublevel clocks? > > I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify. > > Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand. But can > you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest version? Maybe run > some tests with old and new version, to make sure clock tables deliver the > same results? > > Thanks! > > - Carsten
Hi Carsten, I checked and found: - clocktable sums are resulting in identical values, independant of the ":maxlevel" level - without ":maxlevel" parameter some tables now give slightly different results than in the past, some give identical results * I hope the new results are correct, but I did not have time to check in detail Looks good, I will test further. Thanks and thanks! -- Rainer _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode