[Forgot to reply-all - sorry about that. Apologies to Robert for the duplicate email.]
Robert Pluim <rpl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > > > Štěpán Němec <step...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects > >> of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable > >> (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike > >> [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject: > >> header space. > >> > >> I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that. > >> > > > > Because I can scan my inbox at a glance and triage quickly. Here's what > > I see (with mh-e in emacs as my reader): > > > > (disclaimer: I've been seeing this argument for the best part of 20 > years, I doubt I'm bringing anything new to the table, but I feel > strongly about it) > > Triage is for *computers* to do, they're much better at it than humans. > You are kidding, right? How does the computer know what *I* need to do? > Also, those markers in the subject are obnoxious and *really* annoying, > and take up valuable screen space. Please don't clutter up the org-mode > emails for zero benefit. > It is *not* zero benefit to me. Nick _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
