Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > [Forgot to reply-all - sorry about that. Apologies to Robert for > the duplicate email.] >
This is why I have Mail-Copies-To: never in my headers :) No biggie. > Robert Pluim <rpl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: >> >> > Štěpán Němec <step...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> FWIW, I do. Having [Org] (or anything, really) prepended to the subjects >> >> of _all_ mails coming from a list that is already uniquely identifiable >> >> (e.g. by its address) has no information value altogether (unlike >> >> [Babel], [PATCH] etc.) and only takes up the much precious Subject: >> >> header space. >> >> >> >> I have never understood why anyone would like anything like that. >> >> >> > >> > Because I can scan my inbox at a glance and triage quickly. Here's what >> > I see (with mh-e in emacs as my reader): >> > >> >> (disclaimer: I've been seeing this argument for the best part of 20 >> years, I doubt I'm bringing anything new to the table, but I feel >> strongly about it) >> >> Triage is for *computers* to do, they're much better at it than humans. >> > > You are kidding, right? How does the computer know what *I* need to do? > Because you tell it what to do? >> Also, those markers in the subject are obnoxious and *really* annoying, >> and take up valuable screen space. Please don't clutter up the org-mode >> emails for zero benefit. >> > > It is *not* zero benefit to me. OK. Zero benefit to people who split their email then. I must admit I've never understood why people don't, but to each his own. Robert _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
