Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18 2011, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > That was of course before you took out the concat in 9216453a388 - after > > that change, there is no problem: it was doing (concat nil) ==> "" > > What's weird is that that concat has not been introduced by my recent > patches. It clearly seems wrong, but I don't see why no bug was > triggered before. >
Neither do I. I thought the concat was concatenating two things before you took out the prefix-length property, but I took another look and it was doing exactly the same thing before and after that change: what you took out was the second part of the setq. By all accounts, it should have triggered the error long ago. So it is a minor mystery. > Anyhow, if everything is ok now, that's perfect. :) > Yup :) Nick
