On 3/23/11 12:28 PM, "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks for pointing this out, your example doesn't work for me either. >I tracked this down to a problem of not finding the cached results of >named code blocks. I've just pushed up a simple fix for this issue, so >caching should now work as expected. Thanks Eric. In my case I'm seeing the [mis]behavior even when the code block has no name - will your fix cover that case too? -Ken
