<ken.willi...@thomsonreuters.com> writes: > On 3/23/11 12:28 PM, "Eric Schulte" <schulte.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Thanks for pointing this out, your example doesn't work for me either. >>I tracked this down to a problem of not finding the cached results of >>named code blocks. I've just pushed up a simple fix for this issue, so >>caching should now work as expected. > > Thanks Eric. In my case I'm seeing the [mis]behavior even when the code > block has no name - will your fix cover that case too? > > -Ken
Hi Ken, Could you send me a minimal example the demonstrates the misbehavior? Thanks -- Eric
