Hi Carsten and Bastien On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 16:44, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: > is there an agreement that this is a good patch? I have not followed the > discussion.....
Let me summarize: > On Oct 16, 2011, at 9:12 PM, Michael Brand wrote: >> The previous patch attachment had a wrong mime type, could therefore >> not be caught by patchwork and has not been accepted. Only a clarification about "has not been accepted": The first version of my patch has just not been applied, there was no disagreement or reject. The second version was only to get my patch into patchwork at all and to rebase it at the design level. For the change in org-version (substitution of the "-" from the git tag delivered by git describe with "."): As Bernt is the author of this substitution I originally asked him if I could remove it to align with the output of git describe and he agreed. He now has reviewed this part of the second version of my patch and he is fine with it. There has not yet been any review or comment on the changes in the Makefile and in UTILITIES/set-version.pl. I would be happy if these parts could be reviewed too. Michael