Simon Castellan <simon.castel...@iuwt.fr> writes:

> Thank you very much for this pointer, This is what I was looking for :
> a list of syntaxic construction in org-mode. I'd say though that it
> lacks a more-or-less formal syntaxic definition of constructions.

It lacks that, indeed, among many other things. On the other hand, it's
a work in progress, so I guess that explains why.

I had postponed such a definition of constructions, since the model used
to describe the Org format wasn't (and still isn't) complete. Actually,
the list that you can observe in org-element.el will change a little
during the next few weeks.

Anyway, I agree that a document formally describing each element/object
in Org has to be written at some point. Even if I think it's one or two
months too early for that task, I'll gladly offer my help if you decide
to undertake it nonetheless. Do not hesitate to ask if you need more


Nicolas Goaziou

Reply via email to