Hi Bastien, of course this is how I'd like it to work as well, but this was too hard for the moment... :(
On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:33 AM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: > Hi Carsten and Max, > > "Dominik, Carsten" <c.domi...@uva.nl> writes: > >> already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first >> version of his code to implement multiple agenda buffers. I have >> worked with him over the last few weeks, and we think that >> it is now quite stable. > > I've been trying the agenda-sticky branch a few times now and I love > this feature -- thanks a lot! > > One request: I often use buffer restrictions in combination with agenda > views. For example, I restrict to a first-level tree then run my daily > agenda on that tree. > > In this case, using sticky agenda is a bit confusing because I expect > a completely different agenda view while using the same agenda key (none > of the items in a tree are part of another subtree.) > > Could we have an option allowing a set of rules (or a set of agenda > views) for which we want the rebuilding to be done automatically? I > would turn on this for my daily agenda views. > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien
