Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 01:31:17PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: >> >> > François Pinard <pin...@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: >> > >> >> Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes: >> >> >> >>> Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: >> >> >> >>>> The first step is probably to research the differences between xhtml and >> >>>> html 5. >> >> >> >>> Well, I would even skip this step and just hack something usable. >> >> >> I sort of fudged on the below. The upside is that it should be pretty >> forgiving now: you can set all kinds of strings as your :html-doctype, >> and it will do a reasonably good job of guessing how to handle it. >> >> Barring actual bugs or poor design decisions, what's left to do is: >> >> 1. Make sure that inlined script and style chunks are escaped correctly, >> I seem to remember reading that the commenting/escaping syntax for these >> chunks varies according to html flavor. >> >> 2. I'd like to add the possibility to put an arbitrary :html-container > >> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp >> #+TITLE: HTML 5 Test >> #+DATE: {{{modification-time(%Y-%m-%d)}}} >> #+HTML_DOCTYPE: html5 >> #+BIND: org-html-divs ((preamble "header" "preamble") (content "section" >> "content") (postamble "footer" "postamble")) >> * Org HTML5 Test >> #+ATTR_HTML: :options html-container article > > note that you just just set #+HTML_CONTAINER: article in the head of the > file if you want all the containers to be "article"s.
That would be pretty drastic, though -- it would wrap "article" around a whole bunch of stuff that shouldn't be an article! I think ultimately the HTML exporter should grow a slightly more flexible system for wrapping document sections in containers, but this patch definitely shouldn't get hung up on that. >> +(defconst org-html-doctype-alist >> + '(("html4" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN\">") >> + ("html4-strict" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN\"> >> +\"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd\"") >> + ("xhtml" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN\" >> +\"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd\">") >> + ("html5" . "<!DOCTYPE HTML>")) > > I believe that should be (note the lowercase "html"): > > ("xhtml" . "<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN\" >> +\"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd\">") > ("html5" . "<!DOCTYPE html>") > > See http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_doctype.asp for a fairly > complete list of valid doctypes. Cool, thanks for the reference. If the approach of this patch seems generally acceptable I'll try to add most of the commonly-used doctypes in there. I'm waffling on XHTML5, though -- from what I can tell it's a spec everyone sort of thought ought to be in there, but no one is actually using. E